TOCICO

Using a hands-on example, the participant learns the techniques to create a framework for a branch (Skeleton), identifying if the framework is detailed enough prior to writing for sufficiency; assessing the need for clarifying assumptions, identifying what those assumptions must clarify, writing those assumptions clearly on the first pass. Those experienced in the thinking processes or new to them can write better branches immediately. The example used is a relatable subject. Based on a newspaper article, the participants identify the root cause and resulting negative effect that seem to have no connection to each other. Using the article the students identify the important connections from the ancillary information. They build the detailed skeleton. They then learn to use the immediate effect to quickly identify what must be the author’s (or their) assumption in making the logical connection. They then complete the branch. The session will cover how using this technique can be used with others to visualize their assumptions, trim negative branches and to break core conflicts within the Current Reality Tree. Though the example used is from a newspaper article, the participants will leave with an easy step process that helps them capture what information they do have or can reliably surmise and how to fill in the missing information. Questions: 1. How do I know if I have the significant effect or effects to start with? 2. How do I check my skeleton is detailed enough? 3. Why can’t I start writing sufficiency immediately? This workshop is a based on 25 years of breaking the code of teaching cause and effect to both Jonahs and Jonah’s Jonah. In all cases the results have been a quick grasp of this key building block of the TOC thinking processes. Participants walk away with a successful example they wrote; a multi-step process they can use on their own; and ways they can refine their skills quickly on practice subjects.