About this Presentation
How to build a logically consistent strategy and tactics (S&T) tree? How to scrutinize, validate or criticize a S&T built by others in order to improve its logical consistency? What are the links between the entities of an S&T tree and the traditional thinking processes (TP)? The rigorous definition of the assumptions contained in the steps or nodes (and of the sub categories to which they belong) allows us to build logical models that may be subjected to the filter of the 'categories of legitimate reservations', and thanks to that to improve the logical consistency of the S&T subject to the scrutinizing process. The presentation explores the connections between the traditional analysis carried out with the TP and the verbalization of the entities of S&T trees.
What Will You Learn
To help you get the most value from this session, we’ve highlighted a few key points. These takeaways capture the main ideas and practical insights from the presentation, making it easier for you to review, reflect, and apply what you’ve learned.
Instructor(s)
